Rabid (Malkin) chipmunk talks net neutrality
In the spirit of the holiday we're going to forgo the usual treatment of
Malkin for the idiot that she so aptly plays. Just another fool doing the bidding of her moneyed business overlords.
Again, we should state that we don't line-up with most of her opposition on this matter either. But we fail to see how truth in bandwidth declarations impose unreasonable stricture on providers as she states in the article: When you've drank the kool-aid, you've drank the kool-aid.
Her attempt to align this with health care is a typical device and not really worthy of much consideration.
The downside of connections
We had forgotten that we were registered on the Gawker site but we received an email this morning stating that our information was loose on the
Internet.
Cyberwar, Cybercrime; you say potato, I say...
Two points of note in this story; One silly and shortsighted, the other trenchant.
"McGraw: Because there is a lot of crime, less espionage, and very little cyberwar. (chuckle)"
The contention that cyberwar is not showing its face at this time and therefore should not be a major concern is naive. Helped along by the actions of the Chinese, the U.S. government's willingness to recognize the potential threat has struck us as praise worthy. The offensive approach to this matter is in fact mirrored by the reality of constantly changing vectors of attack in current civilian IT security.
"One of our main points is that there is a confusing blend of cyberwar stuff, cyber-espionage stuff and cybercrime stuff, and the stories are used to justify whatever political or economic end people may have..."
In addition to a newer variant on the old military/industrial complex boogieman, the potential for abuse in this manner of lumping it altogether is frightening.